Pages

Share This

Showing posts with label UTAR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UTAR. Show all posts

Sunday, November 24, 2024

Equal opportunity in accounting

Rising support for gender diversity, inclusivity in profession

The importance of diversity and gender balance in professional fields, including accounting, has gained recognition in recent times.

The accounting profession, as a crucial component of the business world, said Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) chief executive officer Helen Brand (OBE), greatly benefits from incorporating varied perspectives and experiences into its decision-making processes.

As one of the most influential voices in the profession, Brand, who was in Kuala Lumpur on Sept 6 for the 88th ACCA Anniversary Gala Dinner, sat down with StarEdu to talk about the evolving landscape of accountancy, particularly in relation to diversity, inclusion, and the future of work.

As of October 2024, women make up a substantial 62% of the accounting workforce in Malaysia, compared to 38% for men, according to ACCA’s member demographics.

“Diversity of thought and inclusive representation are not just moral imperatives – they are essential for driving better business performance and innovative solutions.

ALSO READ: Tackling inequalities

“Different perspectives can also lead to better solutions by avoiding groupthink and by ensuring a comprehensive understanding of customer needs,” Brand shared.

Brand, who is a founding member of the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), is also a member of the United Kingdom government’s Professional and Business Services Council, and has participated in a number of trade advisory forums and university advisory boards.

Many businesses, she pointed out, are now committed to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) due to increasing pressure from the public, governments and regulators, requiring them to demonstrate social inclusion alongside profitability.

SDG 5, she said, is one of the 17 SDGs that seeks to achieve gender equality and empower women and girls.

BrandBrand

Gender equality is a basic human right and an essential factor for building a peaceful, prosperous and sustainable world, she added.

“It’s becoming increasingly important for businesses to show they include all parts of society in their workforce and have a positive impact.

“Inclusive slogans, however, must be backed up with tangible achievements.“Reporting on gender diversity in annual and integrated reports has become as essential as financial performance reporting,” she said, noting that companies excelling in gender diversity often see better financial results due to a broader talent pool that gives employers the biggest opportunity to recruit the best person.“Inclusion means recognising different attributes as equal, not lesser, and that’s what we can achieve by making sure that there’s equal representation with women,” she explained.

Brand emphasised that the UN SDGs play an important role, providing a clear framework to guide people’s actions and assess their progress.

The focus, she said, should not just be on financial performance.

“The ongoing discussion about sustainability, including the impact businesses have on people and the significance of human capital, is a major step forward, extending beyond the scope of the SDGs,” she said.

Gender diverse teams, said Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR) Faculty of Business and Finance Department of Commerce and Accountancy head Dr Sonia Johanthan, bring varied perspectives that enhance problem-solving and decision-making.

“In accounting, this means better risk assessments, financial planning, and client relations.

“Diversity also fosters creativity, which is critical for addressing complex client needs and adapting to evolving regulations in the accounting industry.

“According to a prior study, diverse board members often excel in building strong client relationships, leading to improved client satisfaction and retention, consequently increase in the firm’s value.

“The study also showed that organisations with gender diversity often outperform less diverse ones in profitability and operational efficiency,” she said.

Driving change

ACCA, said Brand, has made significant strides in promoting gender parity and broader diversity within its ranks.

“Of the 46 members on ACCA’s governing council, 26 are women, with the overall membership at 52% male and 48% female, which is nearing parity. The majority of our students are women,” she said, adding that this shift is not merely symbolic; it reflects a concerted effort to cultivate an inclusive culture and provide equal opportunities for professional advancement.

“It’s important to understand that driving diversity and inclusion is a cultural issue within an organisational business.

“Implementing systems and processes to support this culture doesn’t yield instant results; it takes time. For example, you may have a single woman on the board or at the executive level, but it does not make a difference when they’re in the minority, and their voice often isn’t heard.

“While one is better than none, achieving true diversity is a gradual process that requires continuous effort,” she said.

The real disparity, she said, is when women tend not to progress to more senior roles, despite having extensive educational and professional experience.

“In order to be a female leader, maybe about 30 years ago, you had to take on the attributes associated with men, because you had to show that you were strong, decisive, and could move things forward.

“Now, we understand that there are different styles of leadership that are equally valid, more consultative, collaborative, solutions focused, less driven by ego and more driven by outcomes, and this opens up possibilities to men and women who want to lead in a different way,” she said.

She added that it is essential for everyone to be on board and aligned to the organisation’s purpose to be a successful business, and one way to achieve this is by ensuring that every person feels supported and able to reach their full potential.

“Sometimes, interventions – whether through new laws or regulatory changes – can help drive the change that is necessary, because you need a shock to the system for it to change.

“For example, if things like board membership and leadership positions were left to develop organically, it might take many more years before we are able to reach parity,” she said.

Diversity in all aspects

Brand explained that while gender is a significant issue, particularly in some countries, there are many other important aspects of diversity that also need attention.

These include individuals from less privileged economic backgrounds, people of different ethnicities, and those with neurodiversity, as there are various ways in which certain groups have been excluded or not provided the same opportunities as others, both in society and in the workplace.

“There is a growing focus on the broader concept of diversity and inclusion, which ensures that everybody has the best possible opportunity to thrive,” she said.

She added that ACCA has implemented a range of initiatives to foster an inclusive environment and provide women with the tools and support they need to thrive, including offering specific training programmes to help women develop the confidence and skills to apply for roles they might not have considered before.

“We’ve also put in place flexible working arrangements that support both women and men in balancing their professional and personal commitments,” she said.

Alongside its diversity initiatives, she said, ACCA is also at the forefront of equipping its members with the competencies needed to navigate the profession’s evolving landscape, proving that diversity in skillsets is also valued.

“The integration of technology into the skillsets of professional accountants will become even more crucial moving forward.

“We’ve launched continuous professional development courses for members who are already qualified to make sure that they update their skills to remain relevant, and that covers top topics such as data science, data analytics, internal audit, new standards, and sustainability,” she said.

Brand believes that the profession’s ability to harness these technologies in an ethical and inclusive manner will be a defining factor in its long-term success.

“We need to ensure that the algorithms and data used are free from bias, and that the governance frameworks protect individual privacy and promote transparency.

“Accountants will play a pivotal role in navigating these complex ethical considerations,” she said.

Towards better support

“Gender bias still exists in the business world, although it has diminished over time.

The obstruction to career progression and professional growth for women is the challenge of a work-life balance, particularly for those with children. In a fast-paced and high-pressure environment of a professional accounting firm, long hours and constant change are the norm.

During my pregnancy, while working in Malaysia, I was reassigned from client work to the firm’s training centre in my third trimester, where I handled administrative tasks and facilitated in-house training.

When I returned from maternity leave, I was again given client assignments, which made me feel as though I was back on track with my career.

To empower and support women in the profession, firms need to offer greater flexibility in their work options.

This includes the possibility of working from home and flexible working hours. Additionally, firms should be transparent about career development opportunities by providing structured mentorship, professional development programmes, and clear paths to promotion.

This will help women accountants make informed decisions about their careers and achieve their ambitions.

By fostering an environment of support, firms can retain valuable talent and ensure that women can thrive in the profession.”– Sunway Business School Department of Accounting lecturer

Choo Sook Yin“The main issue lies in the persistent stereotype about women’s abilities, which limits their opportunities for growth.

In many Asian countries, where the workforce is predominantly male, the lack of female role models makes it more difficult for women to envision their own career progression.

The demanding nature of accounting roles can be especially challenging for women, particularly those juggling responsibilities in traditional households where they are expected to fulfil domestic obligations.

Additionally, women often face a networking gap, limiting their access to influential professional connections that are crucial for career advancement.

This underscores the need for focused efforts by firms, professional organisations and policymakers to support the career development and professional growth of women in accounting.

For example, the 2023 Global Gender Gap Index highlights Sweden as a leader in promoting gender equality, with high female educational attainment and robust parental leave policies.

Pregnant women in Sweden can take up to 390 days of maternity and parental leave, and women with children under eight are allowed to reduce their work hours by 25%. Such policies could help empower women, encouraging them to grow in their profession.”– UTAR Faculty of Business and Finance Department of Commerce and Accountancy head Dr Sonia Johanthan

Women at the fore

The recent appointment of Datuk Zaiton Mohd Hassan (pic) as vice president of ACCA marks the first time that women have held all three officer posts simultaneously in the global professional accountancy body, founded in 1904.

Zaiton joins fellow senior officers Ayla Majid, president and sustainability strategist from Pakistan, and deputy president Melanie Proffitt, from England, who is the chief financial officer of Farncombe Estate, a hotel group.

Together, they represent more than 252,500 members and 526,000 future members across 180 countries, a press release dated Nov 18 read.

Zaiton is the chief executive officer of the Malaysia Professional Accountancy Centre (MyPAC), a non-profit dedicated to helping students from poorer backgrounds pursue careers in finance. She also holds senior non-executive director positions, including chair of GX Bank, Malaysia’s first digital bank.

She was elected to ACCA’s Council in 2016 and previously served as president of the ACCA Malaysia Advisory Committee. Additionally, she has served as deputy chair of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) Professional Accountants in Business (PAIB) Committee.

Source link

Related stories:

Tackling inequalities

Related post:

New Zealand may have a solution for world’s debt

Tuesday, November 27, 2018

Politicising education hurts the Chinese

 

https://youtu.be/1F2l-BKDXGA


As Malaysia tackles a RM1 trillion national debt, it may be wise for Lim Guan Eng to focus on revitalising the economy than to whip up a confrontation with his own community over a RM30mil grant


WHEN Finance Minister Lim Guan Eng, in his Budget 2019 presented early this month, removed the RM30mil matching grant for Tunku Abdul Rahman University College (TAR UC), it hurt not just the MCA but also the Chinese community.

The government will provide a mere RM5.5mil as development fund to TAR UC. The fuming Chinese community is now taking up the issue as TAR UC, along with Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR), another institution of higher learning linked to MCA, has provided affordable education to many Chinese students over the past 50 years.

The removal of the matching grant to TAR UC – an annual amount given by the Barisan Nasional government to the university college previously to match the funds it raised – will negatively impact its continued survival.

Hence, emotive comments against Lim have been dominating the vernacular media since the grant issue emerged.

A petition against the Finance Ministry has also been launched.

Notably, though they are two non-profit institutions set up by MCA – TAR UC in 1969 and UTAR in 2001 – they are now seen as part and parcel of the Chinese community, which has been supporting their operation and expansion with billions in cash donations and land.

The late philanthropist of Penang, Tan Sri Loh Boon Siew, told me in an interview in 1991 that he had contributed land and cash to TAR UC. Other Chinese tycoons, too, have privately shared such information with me.

Together with the matching grants from the government totalling RM1.353bil over the last 50 years, MCA was able to expand the reach of the university college, from Setapak to Penang, Sabah and Pahang.

In the last 17 years, MCA also built UTAR campuses in Sungai Long (Selangor) and Kampar (Perak).

In the five decades since TAR UC started, children from poor Chinese families and other ethnic groups, regardless of political leanings, have benefitted from the education offered by it due to its affordable fees.

In fact, TAR UC and UTAR are two of MCA’s best non-political projects which have contributed tremendously to the Chinese society, to compensate for its past failure to safeguard Chinese rights in the Umno-dominated Barisan regime.

Putting into historical context, TAR UC – which started as TAR College before being upgraded to university college status in 2013 – was a product of political compromise when non-­bumiputra student intake into the five public universities then was limited by the introduction of the bumiputra quota. The one-to-one matching grant enabled TAR UC to provide an avenue for higher education for those from the lower-income group as well as performing students denied entry into public universities by the quota system.

Hence on Sept 15, 1972, Datuk Hussein Onn, the then-Education Minister, handed over the Instrument of Government to the institution.

A 77ha plot in Setapak was allocated for the construction of TAR College’s main campus.

Later, UTAR was set up and officially launched on Aug 13, 2002, by then Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir Mohamad after higher education in the private sector was liberalised.

According to MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Wee Ka Siong, some 200,000 students have graduated from TAR UC/UTAR over the past 50 years.

Currently, the student population in the two institutions totals 28,000. Employees stand at 1,500 (60% Chinese, 40% non-Chinese).

These figures show that not just the Chinese have benefitted from the existence of UTAR and TAR UC but the Malays and Indians as well. Among the Pakatan Harapan leaders who were beneficiaries of the TAR affordable education are Cabinet ministers Teresa Kok, Datuk Salahuddin Ayub and Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail as well as Penang Chief Minister Chow Kon Yeow and exco member Chong Eng.

As these two institutions have become integral to the Chinese community, it is natural that vernacular newspapers are following closely the developments in this issue.

From the writing in the Chinese media, it can be seen that this issue is threatening to become a “Chinese community vs LGE/DAP” confrontation. This may not augur well for Lim.

While there are people who agree with Lim’s argument to separate education from politics, and that MCA must cut its links with these institutions, they form a miserable minority.

In a strongly worded comment piece “Play-killing UTAR”, Sin Chew Daily deputy editor-in-chief Tay Tian Yan points out that in speaking up on the grant issue, it is not meant to support MCA, but to show concern for the future generations of the Chinese community, particularly those from the poorer classes.

In response to Lim’s warning to MCA that the two institutions cannot raise tuition fees, Tay concludes: “UTAR will die an eventual death if it cannot raise fees and is not given a grant. What will be the future of our Chinese youth?”

Generally, Lim is seen as abusing his power to punish his political rivals and in the process undermine the interest of his very own community. Such political gimmicks should be stopped when dealing with taxpayers’ money, given that 80% of the country’s revenue is contributed by Chinese businesses and individuals in the form of taxes.

For many people, it is particularly repugnant when Lim threatened to “take action” against MCA if the institutions raise tuition fees.

In a China Press editorial yesterday, Lim was reminded that last year when he was Penang Chief Minister, he had said education allocations to schools should be given regardless of political backgrounds. And he acted fairly.

“But after LGE became Finance Minister, his statement last year on equality dissipated. Shouldn’t the former Penang CM give a big scolding to the current Finance Minister?” asks the writer mockingly.

The Pakatan government has also been reminded that 95% of Chinese voted them in to oust the previous administration in the May 9 general election. Their support should not be taken for granted and forgotten.

In short, TAR UC and UTAR should not be penalised just because of their parental link with MCA.

Looking at national development, these two institutions have nurtured much talent to serve the country, particularly in the field of accountancy.

File photo of UTAR's Faculty of Business and Finance in Kampar, Perak.
File photo of UTAR's Faculty of Business and Finance in Kampar, Perak.
In fact, from my own observations, these institutions are more professionally run than many other private colleges and universities.

For this reason, and for their affordable fees, my husband and I sent our daughter to study in UTAR. She graduated last June.

As the country is confronted with a slowing economy and has to tackle a national debt of over RM1 trillion, it may be wiser for Lim to focus on revitalising the economy and other bigger national issues than to whip up a confrontation with his own community over a RM30mil grant.

By  Ho Wah Foon, The Star


Related post:


Politicising education hurts the Chinese

 

https://youtu.be/1F2l-BKDXGA


As Malaysia tackles a RM1 trillion national debt, it may be wise for Lim Guan Eng to focus on revitalising the economy than to whip up a confrontation with his own community over a RM30mil grant


WHEN Finance Minister Lim Guan Eng, in his Budget 2019 presented early this month, removed the RM30mil matching grant for Tunku Abdul Rahman University College (TAR UC), it hurt not just the MCA but also the Chinese community.

The government will provide a mere RM5.5mil as development fund to TAR UC. The fuming Chinese community is now taking up the issue as TAR UC, along with Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR), another institution of higher learning linked to MCA, has provided affordable education to many Chinese students over the past 50 years.

The removal of the matching grant to TAR UC – an annual amount given by the Barisan Nasional government to the university college previously to match the funds it raised – will negatively impact its continued survival.

Hence, emotive comments against Lim have been dominating the vernacular media since the grant issue emerged.

A petition against the Finance Ministry has also been launched.

Notably, though they are two non-profit institutions set up by MCA – TAR UC in 1969 and UTAR in 2001 – they are now seen as part and parcel of the Chinese community, which has been supporting their operation and expansion with billions in cash donations and land.

The late philanthropist of Penang, Tan Sri Loh Boon Siew, told me in an interview in 1991 that he had contributed land and cash to TAR UC. Other Chinese tycoons, too, have privately shared such information with me.

Together with the matching grants from the government totalling RM1.353bil over the last 50 years, MCA was able to expand the reach of the university college, from Setapak to Penang, Sabah and Pahang.

In the last 17 years, MCA also built UTAR campuses in Sungai Long (Selangor) and Kampar (Perak).

In the five decades since TAR UC started, children from poor Chinese families and other ethnic groups, regardless of political leanings, have benefitted from the education offered by it due to its affordable fees.

In fact, TAR UC and UTAR are two of MCA’s best non-political projects which have contributed tremendously to the Chinese society, to compensate for its past failure to safeguard Chinese rights in the Umno-dominated Barisan regime.

Putting into historical context, TAR UC – which started as TAR College before being upgraded to university college status in 2013 – was a product of political compromise when non-­bumiputra student intake into the five public universities then was limited by the introduction of the bumiputra quota. The one-to-one matching grant enabled TAR UC to provide an avenue for higher education for those from the lower-income group as well as performing students denied entry into public universities by the quota system.

Hence on Sept 15, 1972, Datuk Hussein Onn, the then-Education Minister, handed over the Instrument of Government to the institution.

A 77ha plot in Setapak was allocated for the construction of TAR College’s main campus.

Later, UTAR was set up and officially launched on Aug 13, 2002, by then Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir Mohamad after higher education in the private sector was liberalised.

According to MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Wee Ka Siong, some 200,000 students have graduated from TAR UC/UTAR over the past 50 years.

Currently, the student population in the two institutions totals 28,000. Employees stand at 1,500 (60% Chinese, 40% non-Chinese).

These figures show that not just the Chinese have benefitted from the existence of UTAR and TAR UC but the Malays and Indians as well. Among the Pakatan Harapan leaders who were beneficiaries of the TAR affordable education are Cabinet ministers Teresa Kok, Datuk Salahuddin Ayub and Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail as well as Penang Chief Minister Chow Kon Yeow and exco member Chong Eng.

As these two institutions have become integral to the Chinese community, it is natural that vernacular newspapers are following closely the developments in this issue.

From the writing in the Chinese media, it can be seen that this issue is threatening to become a “Chinese community vs LGE/DAP” confrontation. This may not augur well for Lim.

While there are people who agree with Lim’s argument to separate education from politics, and that MCA must cut its links with these institutions, they form a miserable minority.

In a strongly worded comment piece “Play-killing UTAR”, Sin Chew Daily deputy editor-in-chief Tay Tian Yan points out that in speaking up on the grant issue, it is not meant to support MCA, but to show concern for the future generations of the Chinese community, particularly those from the poorer classes.

In response to Lim’s warning to MCA that the two institutions cannot raise tuition fees, Tay concludes: “UTAR will die an eventual death if it cannot raise fees and is not given a grant. What will be the future of our Chinese youth?”

Generally, Lim is seen as abusing his power to punish his political rivals and in the process undermine the interest of his very own community. Such political gimmicks should be stopped when dealing with taxpayers’ money, given that 80% of the country’s revenue is contributed by Chinese businesses and individuals in the form of taxes.

For many people, it is particularly repugnant when Lim threatened to “take action” against MCA if the institutions raise tuition fees.

In a China Press editorial yesterday, Lim was reminded that last year when he was Penang Chief Minister, he had said education allocations to schools should be given regardless of political backgrounds. And he acted fairly.

“But after LGE became Finance Minister, his statement last year on equality dissipated. Shouldn’t the former Penang CM give a big scolding to the current Finance Minister?” asks the writer mockingly.

The Pakatan government has also been reminded that 95% of Chinese voted them in to oust the previous administration in the May 9 general election. Their support should not be taken for granted and forgotten.

In short, TAR UC and UTAR should not be penalised just because of their parental link with MCA.

Looking at national development, these two institutions have nurtured much talent to serve the country, particularly in the field of accountancy.

File photo of UTAR's Faculty of Business and Finance in Kampar, Perak.
File photo of UTAR's Faculty of Business and Finance in Kampar, Perak.
In fact, from my own observations, these institutions are more professionally run than many other private colleges and universities.

For this reason, and for their affordable fees, my husband and I sent our daughter to study in UTAR. She graduated last June.

As the country is confronted with a slowing economy and has to tackle a national debt of over RM1 trillion, it may be wiser for Lim to focus on revitalising the economy and other bigger national issues than to whip up a confrontation with his own community over a RM30mil grant.

By  Ho Wah Foon, The Star


Related post:


Monday, November 26, 2018

Ministers and leaders who benefited from UTAR & TAR UC, removed matching grants to varsity

https://youtu.be/AiIUc3spw-Y

Varsity grads: Chew says he is disappointed with Lim for removing the matching grants when some leaders like (from left) Kok, Salahuddin and Saifuddin were products of the MCA-linked institutions.

KUALA LUMPUR: MCA has pointed out that several Pakatan Harapan leaders were beneficiaries of MCA-linked institutions of higher learning.

MCA central committee member Datuk Chew Kok Woh named ministers Teresa Kok, Datuk Salahuddin Ayub and Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail as the beneficiaries.

He said even Penang Chief Minister Chow Kon Yeow and state executive councillor Chong Eng were products of Tunku Abdul Rahman University College, then known as KTAR, and now TAR UC.

Chew expressed disappointment that Finance Minister Lim Guan Eng had removed matching grants to TAR UC.

He said although TAR UC and Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman were set up by MCA, they were never used for political reasons, saying all the graduates could verify TAR UC and UTAR were apolitical.

He said these institutions were professionally run, adding Lim’s decision spoke volumes about his “politics of vindictiveness”.

In fact, he said, the decision was a timely reminder that DAP had done nothing for education except to criticise.

“What has DAP done for Chinese education? Name us one,” he said in a statement.

He said DAP should not punish parents and students by depriving them of affordable education because of political reasons.

Chew feared that Lim’s action would lead to higher tuition fees at these institutions.

He said many parents, who could not afford private colleges and universities, depended on TAR UC and UTAR.

Chew said the two institutions had produced more than 180,000 graduates of high calibre since its inception in 1969, while UTAR has 56,000 graduates since 2005.

“We need to put aside politics to help Malaysians, especially those from the lower-income background,” he said.

Chew said TAR UC and UTAR graduates, including these Pakatan leaders, could vouch that these two institutions were not “MCA indoctrination centres”.

It was recently announced by Lim that the government would only allocate a RM5.5mil development fund for UTAR and TAR UC, instead of a RM30mil matching grant for TAR UC.

Lim insisted that both education institutes break off ties with MCA before the government provides more allocation for the two institutions.

In the Dewan Rakyat, Ayer Hitam MP and MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Wee Ka Siong debated with Lim, stating that the matching grants were vital to help ensure lower student fees for the two institutions.

On Facebook, Dr Wee expressed his disappointment in the Finance Minister’s reply, adding that TAR UC was wholly owned by the TARC Education Foundation and should not be seen as part of MCA’s assets, and that the university college also submitted audited accounts to the Education Ministry every year.

Dr Wee also told reporters in Parliament House that TAR UC might have to increase its fees to cover operational costs.

Founded in February 1969 as KTAR, the institute was upgraded to university college status in May 2013 and renamed TAR UC.- The Star

Related News

Politicising education hurts the Chinese

 WHEN Finance Minister Lim Guan Eng, in his Budget 2019 presented early this month, removed the RM30mil matching grant for Tunku Abdul Rahman University College (TAR UC), it hurt not just the MCA but also the Chinese community. The government will provide a mere RM5.5mil as development fund to TAR UC.

File photo of UTAR's Faculty of Business and Finance in Kampar, Perak.
UTAR's Faculty of Business and Finance in Kampar, Perak.

 

Ministers and leaders who benefited from TAR UC & UTAR, removed matching grants to varsity

https://youtu.be/AiIUc3spw-Y

Varsity grads: Chew says he is disappointed with Lim for removing the matching grants when some leaders like (from left) Kok, Salahuddin and Saifuddin were products of the MCA-linked institutions.

KUALA LUMPUR: MCA has pointed out that several Pakatan Harapan leaders were beneficiaries of MCA-linked institutions of higher learning.

MCA central committee member Datuk Chew Kok Woh named ministers Teresa Kok, Datuk Salahuddin Ayub and Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail as the beneficiaries.

He said even Penang Chief Minister Chow Kon Yeow and state executive councillor Chong Eng were products of Tunku Abdul Rahman University College, then known as KTAR, and now TAR UC.

Chew expressed disappointment that Finance Minister Lim Guan Eng had removed matching grants to TAR UC.

He said although TAR UC and Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman were set up by MCA, they were never used for political reasons, saying all the graduates could verify TAR UC and UTAR were apolitical.

He said these institutions were professionally run, adding Lim’s decision spoke volumes about his “politics of vindictiveness”.

In fact, he said, the decision was a timely reminder that DAP had done nothing for education except to criticise.

“What has DAP done for Chinese education? Name us one,” he said in a statement.

He said DAP should not punish parents and students by depriving them of affordable education because of political reasons.

Chew feared that Lim’s action would lead to higher tuition fees at these institutions.

He said many parents, who could not afford private colleges and universities, depended on TAR UC and UTAR.

Chew said the two institutions had produced more than 180,000 graduates of high calibre since its inception in 1969, while UTAR has 56,000 graduates since 2005.

“We need to put aside politics to help Malaysians, especially those from the lower-income background,” he said.

Chew said TAR UC and UTAR graduates, including these Pakatan leaders, could vouch that these two institutions were not “MCA indoctrination centres”.

It was recently announced by Lim that the government would only allocate a RM5.5mil development fund for UTAR and TAR UC, instead of a RM30mil matching grant for TAR UC.

Lim insisted that both education institutes break off ties with MCA before the government provides more allocation for the two institutions.

In the Dewan Rakyat, Ayer Hitam MP and MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Wee Ka Siong debated with Lim, stating that the matching grants were vital to help ensure lower student fees for the two institutions.

On Facebook, Dr Wee expressed his disappointment in the Finance Minister’s reply, adding that TAR UC was wholly owned by the TARC Education Foundation and should not be seen as part of MCA’s assets, and that the university college also submitted audited accounts to the Education Ministry every year.

Dr Wee also told reporters in Parliament House that TAR UC might have to increase its fees to cover operational costs.

Founded in February 1969 as KTAR, the institute was upgraded to university college status in May 2013 and renamed TAR UC.- The Star

Related News

Politicising education hurts the Chinese

 WHEN Finance Minister Lim Guan Eng, in his Budget 2019 presented early this month, removed the RM30mil matching grant for Tunku Abdul Rahman University College (TAR UC), it hurt not just the MCA but also the Chinese community. The government will provide a mere RM5.5mil as development fund to TAR UC.

File photo of UTAR's Faculty of Business and Finance in Kampar, Perak.
UTAR's Faculty of Business and Finance in Kampar, Perak.