Pages

Share This

Deepseek https://www.deepseek.com/./深度求索 DeepSeek | 深度求索
Showing posts with label generative AI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label generative AI. Show all posts

Monday, August 10, 2026

Don’t install apps under pressure, ‘I watched them take control of my phone remotely’

 

Compromised: Scammers are finding more sophisticated ways to bypass safeguards, such as malicious apps disguised as legitimate services. — Pic from magnific.com

PETALING JAYA: As smartphones become central to banking and daily life, scammers are finding increasingly sophisticated ways to seize control of the devices and the accounts within.

Universiti Sains Malaysia Cybersecurity Research Centre director Prof Dr Selvakumar Manickam said criminals were now turning to remote-access tools and malicious applications to bypass conventional scam safeguards.

He said victims could be persuaded to install apps such as AnyDesk or TeamViewer or malicious Android Package Kit (APK) files disguised as legitimate banking, delivery or other services.

Once installed and given permissions such as accessibility access, scammers could potentially view and operate the victim’s phone, including banking applications.

“An unsolicited caller asking the victim to download an app to ‘resolve’ an issue, a request to enable accessibility, SMS or ‘install unknown apps’ permissions, or being asked to remain on a call while installing something, should raise alarm bells,” he said when contacted.

Unexpected battery drain or unusual phone behaviour after installing an application, particularly one downloaded outside authorised sources, are also warning signs.

Selvakumar said scammers were increasingly exploiting psychology rather than simply trying to defeat technical security measures.

“They may create a sense of urgency by claiming a bank account has been frozen, a police matter needs to be resolved or an unpaid bill requires immediate action.

“Generative AI is also making scams more convincing with criminals able to produce polished phishing messages in local languages and clone voices to impersonate family members, bank officers or government officials,” he said.

Beyond screen control, malware can quietly intercept SMS messages and push notifications, including one-time passwords and two-factor authentication codes, before forwarding them to scammers.

Some newer malware could also identify a victim’s SIM card and mobile carrier before subscribing them to premium services through mobile billing systems.

“Fake cellular base stations have also been detected locally, allowing criminals to send fraudulent SMS messages while bypassing some telco-level filtering,” he added.

Selvakumar said the affected phone should subsequently be reset after important data has been backed up or checked by a trusted technician.

“The lesson is simple – never allow urgency or fear to override basic security precautions,” he said.

Cybersecurity expert Fong Choong Fook said social engineering remained one of the biggest threats despite growing public awareness.

“Don’t install any unknown or suspicious software. Have good practices such as not clicking on links from strangers or SMS,” he said.

Fong added that scammers impersonating bank employees, law enforcement officers and government officials could now use AI-generated voice and video to make their identities appear more convincing.

“Users should avoid public WiFi where possible as compromised networks could expose devices to additional risks.”

‘I watched them take control of my phone remotely’


PETALING JAYA: A routine phone call can quickly turn into a financial nightmare when unsuspecting victims lose control of their smartphones to scammers.

Confidential information and other personal details will then be manipulated by these fraudsters, causing financial and emotional distress to the victims.

For a Shah Alam resident who wished to be known only as Lim, the scam started with a phone call from a “bank officer”, warning him about suspicious transactions.

The caller instructed him to download an application, purportedly to verify his identity and secure his account.

Thinking he was following a security procedure, Lim installed the application and granted the requested authorisation.

“After installing it, it seemed that someone had taken control of my phone.

“I could see apps opening by themselves, but I could not control what was happening,” said the 42-year-old.

Within minutes, the scammers had gained access to his banking application and made several transactions.

Lim claimed that he lost about RM7,800 from his account before he managed to disconnect the phone from the Internet and contacted the bank.

“I always thought scams happened because people clicked suspicious links.

“I never expected that scammers could take over my phone while I was still holding it.

“By the time you realise it is the work of a scammer, it is too late, as you have probably already suffered financial losses,” he said.

Another victim, who wished to be known as Tan, 56, from Ipoh, said she was contacted through WhatsApp on July 1.

The caller informed her that she had won a RM3,000 prize and was offered a choice between shopping vouchers or cash credited to her e-wallet.

Tan said she opted for a cash reward, and the call was subsequently transferred to a “manager”, who sounded like a foreigner.

“I just followed his instruction to claim the reward.

“He then took control of my phone screen and kept directing me from one site to another without giving me time to think,” she said.

Tan said she then contacted the platform’s customer service through the app, activated the kill switch and lodged a police report within an hour.

She also said the official complaint submitted through the app, together with screenshots and supporting documents, later disappeared from her phone.

Tan claimed that RM4,500 was charged to her pay-later account while another RM6,000 was withdrawn through the platform’s loan facility, bringing her total losses to RM10,500.

“The RM6,000 purported loan was converted into a 24-month repayment plan, requiring a monthly instalment of over RM300.

“The sum of RM4,500 was transferred to an entity listed as ‘Lucky Boy Trading’, although I had not purchased any items,” she said.

A victim from Subang, who identified himself as Ravi, 35, said scammers posing as delivery company employees convinced him to install an application to reschedule a parcel.

After granting the application access to his phone, he noticed that messages and notifications were appearing and disappearing without his involvement.

“I thought I was only following instructions to receive a parcel. I never expected them to be able to take control of my phone.”

Friday, December 26, 2025

China steals a march on US in tech title race


Making inroads: A woman descends a staircase in a book store in Beijing. Despite considerable geopolitical tensions, Chinese open-source AI models are winning over a growing number of programmers and companies in the United States. — AFP

NEW YORK: As the United States embarks on a bitter rivalry with China over the deployment of artificial intelligence (AI), Chinese technology is quietly making inroads into the US market.

Despite considerable geopolitical tensions, Chinese open-source AI models are winning over a growing number of programmers and companies in the United States.

These are different from the closed generative AI models that have become household names – ChatGPT-maker OpenAI or Google’s Gemini – whose inner workings are fiercely protected.

In contrast, “open” models offered by many Chinese rivals, from Alibaba to DeepSeek, allow programmers to customise parts of the software to suit their needs.

Globally, use of Chinese-developed open models has surged from just 1.2% in late 2024 to nearly 30% in August, according to a report published this month by the developers’ platform OpenRouter and US venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz.

China’s open-source models “are cheap – in some cases free – and they work well,” Wang Wen, dean of the Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China said.

One American entrepreneur, speaking on condition of anonymity, said their business saves US$400,000 annually by using Alibaba’s Qwen AI models instead of the proprietary models.

“If you need cutting-edge capabilities, you go back to OpenAI, Anthropic or Google, but most applications don’t need that,” said the entrepreneur.

US chip titan Nvidia, AI firm Perplexity and California’s Stanford University are also using Qwen models in some of their work.

The January launch of DeepSeek’s high performance, low cost and open source “R1” large language model (LLM) defied the perception that the best AI tech had to be from US juggernauts like OpenAI, Anthropic or Google.

It was also a reckoning for the United States, locked in a battle for dominance in AI tech with China, on how far its archrival had come.

AI models from China’s MiniMax and Z.ai are also popular overseas, and the country has entered the race to build AI agents, programmes that use chatbots to complete online tasks like buying tickets or adding events to a calendar.

Agent friendly, and open-source, models, like the latest version of the Kimi K2 model from the startup Moonshot AI, released in November, are widely considered the next frontier in the generative AI revolution.

The US government is aware of open-source’s potential.

In July, the Trump administration released an “AI Action Plan” that said America needed “leading open models founded on American values”.

These could become global standards, it said.

But so far US companies are taking the opposite track. Meta, which had led the country’s open-source efforts with its Llama models, is now concentrating on closed-source AI instead.

However, this summer, OpenAI, under pressure to revive the spirit of its origin as a nonprofit, released two “open-weight” models – slightly less malleable than “open-source”.

Among major Western companies, only France’s Mistral is sticking with open-source, but it ranks far behind DeepSeek and Qwen in usage rankings.

Western open-source offerings are “just not as interesting”, said the US entrepreneur who uses Alibaba’s Qwen.

The Chinese government has encouraged open-source AI technology, despite questions over its profitability.

Mark Barton, chief technology officer at OMNIUX, said he was considering using Qwen but some of his clients could be uncomfortable with the idea of interacting with Chinese-made AI, even for specific tasks.

Given the current US administration’s stance on Chinese tech companies, risks remain, he said.

“We wouldn’t want to go all-in with one specific model provider, especially one that’s maybe not aligned with Western ideas,” said Barton.

“If Alibaba were to get sanctioned or usage was effectively blacklisted, we don’t want to get caught in that trap.”

But Paul Triolo, a partner at DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group, said there were no “salient issues” surrounding data security.

“Companies can choose to use the models and build on them, without any connection to China,” he explained.

A recent Stanford study published posited that “the very nature of open-model releases enables better scrutiny” of the tech. — AFP

 Related news:

China sets new record of speed in superconducting electromagnetic propulsion for a maglev system: media report

Recently, during a maglev experiment conducted by the maglev team of China's National University of Defense Technology, a ton-class test vehicle was successfully accelerated to 700 kilometers per hour within just two seconds,